The management of tailings and the structural integrity of our tailings storage facilities are critical to community safety and environmental protection.
Tailings storage facilities (TSFs) are engineered structures designed and constructed to hold mineral waste (tailings) from a site’s processing facilities. Our facilities are designed to meet international engineering standards and adhere to rigorous quality control and quality assurance measures throughout the construction phase.
All our operations have tailings facility management plans that are reviewed annually and document the placement of tailings and how each facility will be managed. An overview of our tailing management governance is outlined below.
OceanaGold’s company-wide Integrated Management System provides specific operational standards for risk and TSF management. These standards are audited at a site and corporate level on a regular basis.
Our approach to TSF risk management involves three steps:
- Robust design and site management including permitting, operational management, monitoring and reporting
- Regular auditing of conformance with internal standards and permit requirements at a site and corporate level
- Independent reviews by third-party independent experts.
Our operations also comply with country-specific regulatory requirements.
In June 2019 we responded to the Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative from the Church of England Pension Board and Swedish Council on Ethics for the AP Public Pension Fund. We provided this letter of response and supporting information (updated 28 August 2019). In November 2019, the Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative reported on the responses to the disclosure request in November 2019.
Statement of Position
In August 2019 we launched our Tailing Storage Facility Management Statement of Position.
In this statement, OceanaGold commits itself to designing, constructing and managing TSFs in compliance with all host country TSF regulations, and where applicable, any additional requirements consistent with our TSF management standards and framework.
To achieve this, OceanaGold will:
- Not undertake any new construction of upstream TSFs;
- Report directly to the OGC Board on TSF operational performance and governance processes;
- Define leadership and accountability for TSF governance and performance;
- Continuously review and improve OGC TSF governance, standards and operational performance by:
o Integration of leading globally recognised standards such as ICMM and ICOLD into the OGC Performance Management Standards; and,
o Applying innovation and new technology to minimise risks of TSF failure;
- Undertake transparent communications and proactive engagement with communities, governments and other stakeholders;
- Conduct independent external reviews to assess the quality and performance of the OGC TSF governance, standards and operational management; and
- Independently assure TSF related disclosures in line with Global Reporting Initiative requirements.
The types of TSFs we have
At OceanaGold we utilise four methods of tailings storage:
- Downstream construction;
- Downstream construction with upstream lift;
- In-pit storage and capping; and
- Paste backfill underground.
Downstream TSFs are constructed with a single embankment (wall) formed with waste rock to create engineered embankments that are progressively raised to provide additional space for tailings storage. We utilise the downstream method at the Waihi Gold Mine, Macraes Operations, Haile Gold Mine, the Didipio Mine and Junctions Reef.
Downstream construction with upstream lift
The foundation of the facility embankment is the downstream construction method. Tailings are then discharged into the dam and harden to form the foundation for the next level of wall. This method was utilised at two of the now-closed TSFs at the Macraes Operations.
In-pit storage and capping
Once an open pit is no longer being used it can be backfilled with tailings, as long as potential seepage and other factors can be managed. Once the pit is filled it is then capped with layers of rock and soil, which can be planted. We used the in-pit storage and capping method at the now-closed Souvenir open pit at the Globe Progress Mine at Reefton and at Junctions Reef.
Once processing is complete up to 40% of the mine tailings can be diverted to a paste plant where it is mixed with cement and used as backfill material for underground mine voids, which reduces the volume of tailings delivered to the TSF. We utilise the paste backfill method at our Didipio Mine.
TSFs at our current operations
Didipio Mine, Philippines
Didipio has one TSF, which was designed to exceed compliance standards as stipulated in the guideline issued by the Philippine Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Australian National Committee on Large Dams’ Guidelines on Tailings Dams.
Quality control and assurance of construction criteria and materials is undertaken by an independent engineering specialist with support from operational personnel.
Quarterly and annual monitoring has been implemented since construction commenced by an independent third-party technical expert. In addition, an external review was conducted by a separate independent third-party technical expert in October 2017.
Haile Gold Mine, United States of America
The TSF at Haile became operational in 2016 following final regulatory approval by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC-DHEC), which holds jurisdictional authority over the facility through their Dam Safety Division.
We commissioned an independent technical expert to undertake a Final Construction Inspection Report and a Dam Safety and Structural Review Inspection Report. In addition, the SC-DHEC undertook technical reviews prior to granting approval to operate the TSF.
Waihi Operation, New Zealand
Waihi has two TSFs, although only one is operation. Tailings deposits into the closed and rehabilitated facility ceased in 2005.
Both TSFs were designed by an independent third-party technical expert in accordance with the New Zealand Society of Large Dams. Both TSFs have monitoring plans that are reviewed and approved by the local regulators and undergo extensive internal monitoring. They also have detailed annual regulatory reporting requirements in relation to the stability and performance of pollution controls and environmental effects.
Annual reviews of the construction and operation of the TSFs are undertaken by an independent project engineer. An expert peer review panel has also been appointed to review the annual monitoring program and completion of the facility. This panel comprises independent third-party technical experts appointed by the local regulatory bodies, with expertise in geotechnical engineering, geochemistry, groundwater and rehabilitation.
These annual reviews, conducted since 1987, encompass the following:
- Design, construction, monitoring, performance and stability reports from embankment construction;
- Operation, maintenance, and surveillance records for the period of review; and
- Other internal and external reports related to operations and closure of TSFs, including reviews of compliance against the New Zealand Society of Large Dams (NZSOLD) New Zealand Dam Safety Guidelines.
Macraes Operation, New Zealand
Macraes has three TSFs – two are now closed and will be rehabilitated and one remains operational. All undergo extensive internal monitoring and have detailed annual regulatory reporting requirements regarding the stability and performance of pollution controls and environmental effects.
In 2016 the Macraes TSFs were reviewed by an independent third-party technical expert, concluding in 2017. The review updated a similar assessment performed in 2011, and included design, operation and monitoring processes and a risk assessment of the safety and stability of the tailings embankments based on their status. It also reviewed compliance against the New Zealand Society of Large Dams’ New Zealand Dam Safety Guidelines.