Estimating the proportion of Archey’s frogs in the Wharekirauponga mine vibration footprint 26 References 1. Bishop, P.J., et al. 2013. Native frog (Leiopelma spp.) recovery plan, 2013–2018. Department of Conservation: Wellington. 2. Hunter, G.G. and P.M. Blaschke. 1986. The New Zealand Land Resource Inventory vegetation cover classification. Water & Soil Miscellaneous Publication. Vol. 101. Wellington, New Zealand: National Water and Soil Conservation Authority. 92. 3. Theus, M. and S. Urbanek. 2011. Interactive Graphics for Data Analysis: Principles and Examples: CRC Press. 4. Cree, A. 1989. Relationship between environmental conditions and nocturnal activity of the terrestrial frog, Leiopelma archeyi. Journal of Herpetology. 23: p. 61-68. 5. Hotham, E.R. 2019. Abundance and microhabitat use of Leiopelma archeyi in relation to land-use. Massey University: Palmerston North, NZ. p. 90. 6. Stephenson, E.M. and N.G. Stephenson. 1957. Field observations on the New Zealand frog, Leiopelma fitzinger. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 84: p. 867-882. 7. Perfect, A.J. 1996. Aspects of the ecology of the native frogs Leiopelma archeyi and L. hochstetteri, and the impact of compound 1080. Victoria University: Wellington. 8. Perfect, A.J. and B.D. Bell. 2005. Assessment of the impact of 1080 on the native frogs Leiopelma archeyi and L. hochstetteri. in DOC Research & Development Series Department of Conservation: Wellington. p. 58. 9. Thorsen, M. 1998. Determination of a standardised methodology for long-term monitoring of mainland Leiopelma species. Department of Conservation. 10. Thorsen, M. 1999. Resurvey of Archey's frog Leiopelma archeyi, Mt Moehau, 24 December 1998. in Conservation Advisory Science Notes Department of Conservation: Wellington. 11. Bell, B.D. 1994. A review of the status of New Zealand Leiopelma species (Anura: Leiopelmatidae), including a summary of demographic studies in Coromandel and on Maud Island. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 21(4): p. 341-349. 12. Bell, B.D., et al. 2004. The recent decline of a New Zealand endemic: How and why did populations of Archey’s frog Leiopelma archeyi crash over 1996–2001? Biological Conservation 120: p. 189-199. 13. Haigh, A., S. Pledger, and A. Holzapfel. 2007. Population monitoring programme for Archey’s frog (Leiopelma archeyi): pilot studies, monitoring design and data analysis. in DOC Research & Development Series Department of Conservation: Wellington. p. 25. 14. Williams, B.K., J.D. Nichols, and M.J. Conroy. 2001. Chapter 14: Estimating Abundance for Closed Populations with Mark-Recapture Methods, in Analysis and Management of Animal Populations: Model Estimation and Decision Making Academic Press: San Diego. 15. Bell, B.D. and S. Pledger. 2005. Does toe clipping affect the return rates of the terrestrial frog Leiopelma pakeka on Maud Island, New Zealand? New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 32(Proceedings of the Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand): p. 219–220. 16. Baillargeon, S. and L. Rivest. 2007. The Rcapture Package: Loglinear Models for Capture-Recapture in R. Journal of statistical software 19(5). 17. Baillargeon, S. and L. Rivest. 2015. Package 'Rcapture': Loglinear Models for Capture-Recapture Experiments. CRAN. 18. Gimenez, O., E. Cam, and J.M. Gaillard. 2018. Individual heterogeneity and capturerecapture models: what, why and how? Oikos. 127(5): p. 664-686.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjE2NDg3