Table D.3 TSF3 Permeability Test Data Bore ID Ͳ Shallow Wells Test Aquifer Type Assessed Permeability (m/s) Solution Screen Lithology FHT 1 Not analysed Test too short, did not reach full recovery RHT 1 3.4EͲ07 FHT 2 1.9EͲ07 RHT 2 2.2EͲ07 Min Max FHT 1 1.7EͲ05 RHT 1 1.3EͲ05 FHT 2 8.5EͲ06 RHT 2 2.1EͲ05 FHT 3 1.9EͲ05 RHT 3 1.8EͲ05 FHT4 1.1EͲ05 RHT4 2.0EͲ05 Min Max FHT 1 6.1EͲ06 RHT 1 5.5EͲ06 FHT 2 5.4EͲ06 RHT 2 9.0EͲ06 FHT 3 5.7EͲ06 RHT 3 7.2EͲ06 FHT4 6.3EͲ06 RHT4 7.7EͲ06 Min Max FHT 1 1.7EͲ06 RHT 1 5.1EͲ06 FHT 2 1.5EͲ06 RHT 2 3.9EͲ06 FHT 3 1.6EͲ06 RHT 3 2.2EͲ06 FHT 4 2.7EͲ06 Min Max FHT 1 Not analysed Rapid response RHT 1 Not analysed Rapid response FHT 2 Not analysed Rapid response RHT 2 9.2EͲ05 SpringerͲGelhar, 1991 (Unconfined, inertial) FHT 3 Not analysed Rapid response RHT 3 1.2EͲ04 SpringerͲGelhar, 1991 (Unconfined, inertial) FHT 1 1.8EͲ06 RHT 1 8.6EͲ07 FHT 2 2.0EͲ06 RHT 2 5.2EͲ07 FHT 3 2.0EͲ06 RHT 3 7.7EͲ07 Min Max Bore ID Ͳ Deep Wells Test Aquifer Type Assessed Permeability (m/s) Solution Screen Comments FHT 1 6.4EͲ06 RHT 1 6.3EͲ06 FHT 2 6.6EͲ06 RHT 2 5.3EͲ06 FHT 3 6.4EͲ06 RHT 3 6.5EͲ06 FHT4 6.0EͲ06 RHT4 6.3EͲ06 Min Max RHT 1 1.4EͲ06 Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) RHT 2 Not analysed Rapid response RHT 3 Not analysed Rapid response FHT 1 1.4EͲ06 RHT 1 3.4EͲ06 FHT 2 Not analysed Logger shifted / moved RHT 2 2.3EͲ06 Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) FHT 3 Not analysed Logger shifted / moved RHT 3 3.4EͲ06 FHT 4 2.1EͲ06 RHT 4 3.4EͲ06 Min Max FHT 1 Not analysed WL within screen; screen not developed above WL RHT 1 2.5EͲ04 SpringerͲGelhar, 1991 (Unconfined, inertial) FHT 2 Not analysed WL within screen; screen not developed above WL RHT 2 9.1EͲ05 SpringerͲGelhar, 1991 (Unconfined, inertial) FHT 1 Not analysed Response too slow for meaningful analysis RHT 1 Not analysed Response too slow for meaningful analysis FHT 2 1.80EͲ08 Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) RHT 2 Not analysed Response too slow for meaningful analysis RHT 1 2.14EͲ04 Butler, 1998 (Confined) RHT 2 Not analysed Rapid response RHT 3 Not analysed Rapid response AP01 Unconfined 2 m Screen 3 Ͳ 5 m Rhyolite Ͳ Tuff Bouwer and Rice, 1976 (Unconfined) Geomean 2.4EͲ07 Range: 1.9EͲ07 3.4EͲ07 AP05 Unconfined Bouwer and Rice, 1976 (Unconfined) 2 m Screen 3 Ͳ 5 m Rhyolite Ͳ Tuff Geomean 1.5EͲ05 Range: 8.5EͲ06 2.1EͲ05 AP07 Unconfined Bouwer and Rice, 1976 (Unconfined) 3 m Screen 2.5 Ͳ 5.5 m 1.0 m alluvium; 2.0 Rhyolite Ͳ Tuff Geomean 6.5EͲ06 Range: 5.4EͲ06 9.0EͲ06 AP10 Unconfined Bouwer and Rice, 1976 (Unconfined) 3 m Screen 4 Ͳ 7 m Flow rhyolite, MWͲSW Geomean 2.4EͲ06 Range: 1.5EͲ06 5.1EͲ06 Geomean 1.2EͲ06 Range: 5.2EͲ07 AP11 Unconfined 3 m Screen 4 Ͳ 7 m Flow rhyolite, MWͲSW Geomean n/a Adopted value >1.0EͲ04 2.0EͲ06 DH14 Unconfined Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) No log (3 m screen assumed) Rhyolite Ͳ Tuff AP01a Confined Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) 3 m Screen 36.5 Ͳ 39.5 Flow rhyolite, MWͲSW Geomean 6.2EͲ06 Range: 5.3EͲ06 6.6EͲ06 AP05a Confined (artesian) 3 m Screen 19 Ͳ 22 m Rhyolite Ͳ Tuff Geomean n/a Adopted value >1.0EͲ04 3.4EͲ06 AP10a Unconfined 3 m Screen 15.5 Ͳ 18.5 m Flow rhyolite, MWͲSW Geomean n/a Adopted value >1.0EͲ04 AP07a Confined Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) 3 m Screen 24 Ͳ 27 m Flow rhyolite, CWͲHW Hyder et al, 1994 (KGS model) Geomean 2.5EͲ06 Range: 1.4EͲ06 DH14a* Confined (artesian) No log (assumed 23Ͳ24 m from EGL table) Redeposited Tuff Ͳ sesnsitive (inferred from AP01a log located 2.8 m away) Geomean n/a Adopted value >1.0EͲ04 AP11a Confined 3 m Screen 17 Ͳ 20 m Flow rhyolite, MWͲSW Geomean n/a Adopted value <1.0EͲ08
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjE2NDg3